Did you really think there was a site called www.speedingfinesareastealthtax.com?

There isn't, but the title is true all the same.
Consider this: you are constantly bombarded with the 'speed kills' propaganda to the extent that you feel like a criminal just driving to the shops. The majority of people fall for this - don't become one of them.

Think about it: what causes accidents?
Is it:
A. Driving over the speed limit, or
B. Inexperienced and unskilled drivers making errors of judgment

You would think any intelligent person would answer B., but yet many are inclined to follow the government propaganda that would have us believe exceeding the speed limit is the cause of most accidents.

Yet the most up to date research shows that less than 4% of accidents are caused by excessive speed. This means that nobody is tackling the main problem here - the causes of the other 96%+

PC Smoke D. Ganja

Government Propaganda
Even our favorite traffic cop, PC Smoke D. Ganja understands that road injuries and deaths will not reduce until there is a proper programme of driver education. This would coach drivers to understand judgment of appropriate speed, allied with hazard perception and many other important driving skills.

However, this costs money. The government would rather ignore road accident research and see thousands killed on the road every year, just so they can continue to raise significant revenue through speeding fines.

Of course, further backing is given by 'the greens', who claim, among much other rubbish, that the car is destroying the planet through global warming. They should study the facts which show global warming is a natural phenomenon. The most dangerous 'greenhouse gas'? H20!!

Chocolate Bars and Mineral Water
Sadly, it is not only the motoring enthusiast whose life is made a misery by this 'speed kills' propaganda The everyday motorist is also persecuted beyond belief. You run the risk of losing your licence if you take your eyes off the speedometer for more than a moment.

Your concentration would obviously be better spent on the road ahead. However, you would be forgiven if propaganda had lead you to believe the correct way to drive is to concentrate on the speedo and just take a momentary glance to check the road ahead!

So, if you are 96 and drive down the motorway the wrong way at 30mph, you are likely to be ticked off and told to be on your way. It's speed that causes accidents don't forget, so this would be safe driving. Whilst we have drivers on the road who do not understand hazard perception, car control, lane discipline and the correct use of fog lights (ie. you don't turn them on in heavy rain or when it gets dark), you can end up in court for nibbling a Mars bar or taking a seemingly healthy sip of mineral water.

Where Does This Leave Us?
We are left in a sorry situation. Statistics show that road deaths are not reducing. As a result, the 'speed kills' campaign is gaining more momentum. More cameras, more suspension bashing road calming measures, lower speed limits and satellite speed control. When will the penny drop?: this has not and will not reduce accidents

Speed Limiters - The Concept of Idiots
Sadly, it seems we will shortly be driving at 30 mph on main roads, automatically controlled by satellite! You only have to speak to truck drivers to learn that speed limiters cause accidents through lack of attentiveness caused by boredom.

They also remove the important control over the throttle necessary in an emergency situation. Those that think up these plans clearly have no understanding of car control or advanced driving methods. No longer will we be able to balance the car properly when cornering, as the speed limiter will cut in. On slippery surfaces of course, this will cause the car to be unbalanced resulting in many more accidents. Ever slid off the road and hit a tree? it hurts.

Imagine overtaking that truck. You are half way along its length when the speed limiter cuts in. If a vehicle approaches from the opposite direction, there is only one description of the result: death. Now that's road safety progress.

And what happens when you tell an inexperienced driver his speed is limited to the 'safe' maximum? He drives everywhere at that limited speed because he thinks it is always safe to do so. He has never been taught or had incentive to learn how to set his own safe speed. This is exactly what happens when you assert that safe driving requires you only to drive within the speed limit.

Furthermore, who sets the speed limits? A highly experienced and superbly skilled driving and roadcraft technician? Someone familiar with the latest research on accident causation? A crack team of investigators, armed with top notch road use training and experience? For such an 'important' task, you would think so. However, the responsibility lies with a junior civil servant in the local authority. They might speak to the local Police, but even that scant advice will normally be ignored. They probably don't have any more than a basic driving licence.

Yes, speed limiters, truly the concept of idiots.

The Role of the Traffic Police
Meantime, the Traffic Police are only too happy to exercise their often misguided authority by upholding the speed limits. Don't they just love pulling motorists in for speeding? A pathetic waste of a job, when they could be providing valuable coaching on driving skills and really preventing accidents.

Of course, there are many intelligent and highly competent Traffic Officers in the Police, but their views are constrained by a sensible wish to protect their career and family livelihood. Also, you never see the competent Traffic Officers if you are a responsible driver. This is because they are not wasting time persecuting those skilled drivers who are safely taking advantage of good road conditions by driving swiftly. You speak to those who have left and now give advanced driving tuition to get the real story.

Speeding - A Serious Crime?
However, the propaganda is so deeply set, that both the traffic police and judicial system treat exceeding the speed limit on a par with attempted murder. Only, attempted murder would be easier to get off. You are not likely to be successful with a not guilty plea for speeding, however compelling your evidence. This is because it is widely believed that the Traffic Police are honest and their speed detection equipment is accurate and used correctly. Sadly, none of this is true, resulting in many wrongful convictions by misguided Magistrates. Your only hope then is to exercise your right of appeal to the Crown Court. This is a very costly exercise.

Traffic Police Corruption - The Evidence
Study of recent court cases shows that you would suffer a lesser penalty for stealing a car than you would for driving your own car down a clear motorway at 101 mph. 101mph is used deliberately here, as this is the speed that is almost always reported as showing on the Police detection equipment, even if you were driving at 95mph. This is because at 95mph, you are likely to suffer only a fixed penalty. Over 100mph and you will be banned and more heavily fined. Imagine the Police Officers jolly canteen banter as he tells his pals of how he destroyed another few motorists careers that day, by adjusting their measured speed from 95mph to 101mph and getting them a driving ban.

What Can You Do About It?
If improving road safety is important to you (and it should be), as well as preserving your rights as a responsible driver, then join the Association of British Drivers (ABD). See their web site at www.abd.org.uk

Most importantly though, improve your driving skills through advanced tuition. Learn advanced driving and car control techniques that will make you a safer driver. This will also enhance your driving enjoyment.

You can bet that those who preach from the anti-car and 'speed kills' lobby (who, incidentally, all use cars but don't consider themselves 'motorists' - you can tell who they are - that was one of them who pulled out in front of you on the way home from work tonight) have not bothered to improve their basic driving skills.

By the way:

| Top | Return to Links Page | Home Page |
 
Motoring Pet Hates
1. Drivers who turn on their fog light in mist or rain - they think they are helping to prevent an accident, but don't realise they are helping to cause one by reducing the intensity of their brake lights and dazzling other drivers!!
2. Poor motorway lane discipline - dear oh dear, these idiots fall into 2 categories: the unaware and the deliberate blocker (all in the name of road safety of course!)
3. Drivers who stop at a clear roundabout and then look to see if it is clear, bringing everything to a halt
4. Those annoying drivers who sit at the front of the traffic lights queue in the outside lane and only signal their intention to turn right when the lights go green, thus blocking your path!
5. Drivers who don't know how to use a slip road - they drive to the end and then stop to see if it is clear to join that dual-carriageway, they don't know they are supposed to match their speed and filter into the traffic flow! Then they accelerate slowly into the path of high speed traffic!! When they leave the road, they don't use the slip either, they just grind the following traffic to a halt and turn off, right across the slip road! (without indicating)
5a. Traffic lights at the end of a slip road to gate traffic joining the motorway. Yes, another intelligent idea from a pea-brained prick at county hall. How do you match your speed to that of the motorway when the lights go green? You have roughly 3 metres to do it in! Lovely in my modded 205, but in an oil tanker??
6. Police speed traps on a clear, unbusy main road - keep up the 'valuable' work officers! (by the way, you're twats)
 
Motoring Pet Hates (Not!!)
1. Travelling too close to the car in front on the motorway and flashing headlights in an aggressive manner - because the person they are following has been sat in the outside lane for the last 25 miles!
2. Overtaking on the inside of the motorway - because the person they are 'undertaking' has been sat in the outside lane for the last 25 miles!
3. The Traffic Cops who nearly got blown away by an RAF fighter jet when their missile guidance system locked onto the radar gun - we like the sound of that, and it's a true story!
 
What to Say to a Police Officer after Being Pulled In:
1. "not you again"
2. "don't I know your wife?"
3. "listen copper, I pay more in tax than you earn, so give me a bit of respect"
4. "remember you're a public servant and I pay your wages"
 
Common Police Questions and Recommended Responses
1. Q."blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, son?" (even if you are older than he is)
A. "perhaps you'd like to start again, only this time calling me sir"
2. Q."guess why I have pulled you in?" (they think this is a clever way of getting an admission)
A1. "to congratulate me on my superb driving?"
A2. "because you are Michael Aspel and you have a big red book on your back seat?"
A3. "because you are timewasting pratt, and by the way, you smell of wee"
3. Q."do you think you're Nigel Mansell?" (they even say this to Nigel Mansell)
A1. "Yes" (only use this answer if you are Nigel Mansell)
A2. "No, he's just not cool anymore. I consider myself more of a David Coulthard" (use this answer if you are not Nigel Mansell)
4. Q."i've just attended a fatal road accident" (this is supposed to impress you and scare you into driving slowly)
A. "did you cause it?"
5. Q. "is this your car, son?"
A. "no, I just stole it" (this is unlikely to be true, since the Police are not in the habit of stopping criminals)
 

Here's my mates car with a few choice mods. Unluckily, that's not his girlfriend though.

 
| Top | Return to Links Page | Home Page |